Blumenback, in 1775, added a fifth type, the Ocieanic or brown race. The celebrated naturalist, Linneaus (1708-1778), for instance, listed four races, according to continent, namely: (1) European (white), (2) African (black), (3) Asiatic (yellow), and (4) American (red). The early scientific classifications of the varieties of the human species were geographical in nature. In a rational manner before proceeding further. It is therefore necessary that we discuss the subject of race classification There is a confusion among historians and anthropologists concerning the properĬlassification of races, and this confusion is used by biased writers to bolster up their However, prejudice alone will not account for this sort of The reason for this is obvious the writers of these textbooks are as a rule Nordics, The one race is ofĬourse the white race, and particularly that branch of said race known as the Nordic orĪryan. Responsible for civilization, culture, progress and all other good things. Most history texts, especially the ones on ancient history, start off by telling us that thereĪre either three, four or five races of man, but that of those races only one has been 175) On concluding that theĬivilization of Egypt was a white man civilization, he naturally would be careful not to 80-81.) After discussing the civilizations of Egypt, Babylonia and India, Wells had already referred to them as a “triple system of white manĬivilizations.” (Outline of History, Chap. 31, and Count Volney’s Travels inĮgypt and Syria, Vol. The translation by Professor George Rawlinson In Book II, Section- 104, of hisĬelebrated History, Herodotus states: “For my part I believe the Colchi to be a colony ofĮgyptians, because like them they have black skins and frizzled hair.” (See any English
Totem tribe gold crook and flail series#
Us precise information on the series of resemblances between the Cholchians and theĮgyptians. Would have been proper for Wells to have quoted the remarks of Herodotus, so as to give Herodotus remarked upon a series of resemblances between the Colchians and theĮgyptians.” (Wells’ New and Revised Outline of History, p. Wells ends hisĬhapter on The Early Empires with the following remarks: “No less an authority than Sirįlinders Petrie gives countenance to the idea that there was some very early connectionīetween Colchis (the country to the south of the Caucasus) and prehistoric Egypt. In the latest edition of his Outline of History, Mr. Wells’ has, in truth, caused him to suppress certain facts that do notįit into his pet theories. Wells’ heart beats faster in nearly every chapter of his Outline of History, because he cannot forget that he is Nordic, Aryan,Įnglish British, white, civilized.” (Why We Behave Like Human Beings, p. If there had been anthropologists in Crete, Egypt, and Babylonia, they would have pronounced the white race obviously inferior, and might have discoursed learnedly on the superior germ-plasm or glands of colored folk.” Joseph McCabe Four thousand years ago, when civilization was already one or two thousand years old, white men were just a bunch of semi-savages on the outskirts of the civilized world. “The accident of the predominance of white men in modern times should not give us supercilious ideas about color or persuade us to listen to superficial theories about the innate superiority of the white-skinned man.
Totem tribe gold crook and flail skin#
A race of men now rejected from society for their sable skin and frizzled hair, founded on the study of the laws of nature, those civil and religious systems which still govern the universe.” Count Volney … There a people, now forgotten, discovered while others were yet barbarians, the elements of the arts and sciences. “Those piles of ruins which you see in that narrow valley watered by the Nile, are the remains of opulent cities, the pride of the ancient kingdom of Ethiopia. “It is pretty well settled that the city is the Negro’s great contribution to civilization, for it was in Africa where the first cities grew up.” E. The numerous citations from standard scientific and historical works, it is hoped, will be of some benefit to students who are out of reach of large public libraries, or who lack the leisure time necessary for reading and research along these lines. Much more could be said on this subject, but since this essay is addressed mainly to readers who have little time for the study of history, it must be made as concise as possible. A Critical Review of the Evidence of Archaeology, Anthropology, History and Comparative Religion: According to the Most Reliable Sources and Authorities